<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The inevitable ticking time bomb awaiting Friendfeed.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>PR Digital Strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andymurd</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>andymurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-198</guid>
		<description>When rooms were first announced there was quite a run of people registering spammy sounding room names (picked some up myself). Most such rooms are completely empty and were just taken to deny spammers a nice URL on a trusted site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing that will save FriendFeed is its subscription model - you actively subscribe to people and very few users are going to subscribe to spammers. It&#039;s also really easy to block people so even spammers that are friends of friends disappear quickly. For FriendFeed&#039;s users, spam should not be much of a problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the developers &amp; admins, it will be a problem if automated submissions happen as the article predicts and swamp the servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When rooms were first announced there was quite a run of people registering spammy sounding room names (picked some up myself). Most such rooms are completely empty and were just taken to deny spammers a nice URL on a trusted site.</p>
<p>The thing that will save FriendFeed is its subscription model &#8211; you actively subscribe to people and very few users are going to subscribe to spammers. It&#8217;s also really easy to block people so even spammers that are friends of friends disappear quickly. For FriendFeed&#8217;s users, spam should not be much of a problem.</p>
<p>For the developers &#038; admins, it will be a problem if automated submissions happen as the article predicts and swamp the servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andymurd</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>andymurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-204</guid>
		<description>When rooms were first announced there was quite a run of people registering spammy sounding room names (picked some up myself). Most such rooms are completely empty and were just taken to deny spammers a nice URL on a trusted site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing that will save FriendFeed is its subscription model - you actively subscribe to people and very few users are going to subscribe to spammers. It&#039;s also really easy to block people so even spammers that are friends of friends disappear quickly. For FriendFeed&#039;s users, spam should not be much of a problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the developers &amp; admins, it will be a problem if automated submissions happen as the article predicts and swamp the servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When rooms were first announced there was quite a run of people registering spammy sounding room names (picked some up myself). Most such rooms are completely empty and were just taken to deny spammers a nice URL on a trusted site.</p>
<p>The thing that will save FriendFeed is its subscription model &#8211; you actively subscribe to people and very few users are going to subscribe to spammers. It&#39;s also really easy to block people so even spammers that are friends of friends disappear quickly. For FriendFeed&#39;s users, spam should not be much of a problem.</p>
<p>For the developers &#038; admins, it will be a problem if automated submissions happen as the article predicts and swamp the servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n8k99</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>n8k99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-197</guid>
		<description>the viagra room already directs to a viagra user which seems to be in place to prevent anyone from creating this very thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the viagra room already directs to a viagra user which seems to be in place to prevent anyone from creating this very thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewald Pretorius</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewald Pretorius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Michael, first off, I don&#039;t understand why people criticize you for writing this post. You&#039;ve raised a valid concern.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve noticed that when someone invites you to a room, not only do you receive an email from FriendFeed, the invite is also stuck on the right-hand side of your FriendFeed page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s one feature that I won&#039;t lose sleep over if they removed it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I trust that FriendFeed folks are working on anti-spam measures, because FriendFeed has the potential to be a spammer&#039;s wet-dream. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not only can spammers very easily push their content in the faces of FriendFeed members, they can also abuse the service for getting additional &quot;followed&quot; backlinks to their sites and pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, first off, I don&#8217;t understand why people criticize you for writing this post. You&#8217;ve raised a valid concern.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that when someone invites you to a room, not only do you receive an email from FriendFeed, the invite is also stuck on the right-hand side of your FriendFeed page.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one feature that I won&#8217;t lose sleep over if they removed it.</p>
<p>I trust that FriendFeed folks are working on anti-spam measures, because FriendFeed has the potential to be a spammer&#8217;s wet-dream. </p>
<p>Not only can spammers very easily push their content in the faces of FriendFeed members, they can also abuse the service for getting additional &#8220;followed&#8221; backlinks to their sites and pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warner444</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>warner444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-195</guid>
		<description>funny some commenters think like this is no big deal or it won&#039;t happen, maybe they are spammers.  flag this is ok but it would need a high enough number so it does not have to be managed by some big staff AND cannot be abused by over zealous people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny some commenters think like this is no big deal or it won&#8217;t happen, maybe they are spammers.  flag this is ok but it would need a high enough number so it does not have to be managed by some big staff AND cannot be abused by over zealous people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Awesome way to get people clicking on the link. Lame article, though. Shows clearly that you don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome way to get people clicking on the link. Lame article, though. Shows clearly that you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: callingbull</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>callingbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-193</guid>
		<description>How is this problem different from blog spam or any other type of spam on public systems? You write this as it is a unique phenomenon. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FAIL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this problem different from blog spam or any other type of spam on public systems? You write this as it is a unique phenomenon. </p>
<p>FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n8k99</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>n8k99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-203</guid>
		<description>the viagra room already directs to a viagra user which seems to be in place to prevent anyone from creating this very thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the viagra room already directs to a viagra user which seems to be in place to prevent anyone from creating this very thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewald Pretorius</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewald Pretorius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Michael, first off, I don&#039;t understand why people criticize you for writing this post. You&#039;ve raised a valid concern.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve noticed that when someone invites you to a room, not only do you receive an email from FriendFeed, the invite is also stuck on the right-hand side of your FriendFeed page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s one feature that I won&#039;t lose sleep over if they removed it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I trust that FriendFeed folks are working on anti-spam measures, because FriendFeed has the potential to be a spammer&#039;s wet-dream. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not only can spammers very easily push their content in the faces of FriendFeed members, they can also abuse the service for getting additional &quot;followed&quot; backlinks to their sites and pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, first off, I don&#39;t understand why people criticize you for writing this post. You&#39;ve raised a valid concern.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve noticed that when someone invites you to a room, not only do you receive an email from FriendFeed, the invite is also stuck on the right-hand side of your FriendFeed page.</p>
<p>That&#39;s one feature that I won&#39;t lose sleep over if they removed it.</p>
<p>I trust that FriendFeed folks are working on anti-spam measures, because FriendFeed has the potential to be a spammer&#39;s wet-dream. </p>
<p>Not only can spammers very easily push their content in the faces of FriendFeed members, they can also abuse the service for getting additional &#8220;followed&#8221; backlinks to their sites and pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warner444</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/07/the-inevitable-ticking-time-bomb-awaiting-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>warner444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/?p=199#comment-201</guid>
		<description>funny some commenters think like this is no big deal or it won&#039;t happen, maybe they are spammers.  flag this is ok but it would need a high enough number so it does not have to be managed by some big staff AND cannot be abused by over zealous people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny some commenters think like this is no big deal or it won&#39;t happen, maybe they are spammers.  flag this is ok but it would need a high enough number so it does not have to be managed by some big staff AND cannot be abused by over zealous people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

